Editorial: Increasing robustness, transparency and openness of scientific assessments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Transparency and openness in science
Jeremy Sanders1, Jon Blundy2, Anne Donaldson3, Steve Brown4, Rob Ivison5,6, Miles Padgett7, Kevin Padian8, Katrin Rittinger9, Kerry Rowe10, Anthony Stace11, Essi Viding12, Chris Chambers13 and Mark Chaplain14 1Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 3Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberde...
متن کاملBulletin comment: Openness, transparency and candour†
worst patients. They refuse to seek help for difficulties that, if addressed earlier, might not have resulted in catastrophic complications for themselves and those around them including friends, family and indeed patients. With particularly high rates of psychiatric illness in those working in mental health, it is vital the reasons why those affected delay getting treatment are identified and ...
متن کاملEditorial: Transparency Must Prevail
The theme of this year’s Peer Review Week is transparency. During the last few decades, I believe that a lack of transparency in the review process has degraded the field of scientific publishing. Authors were frequently left confused and angry when conflicting reviews lead to a rejection or when their paper received an obscure rejection and was not reviewed at all. Some journals still use the ...
متن کاملEditorial: Transparency Must Prevail
The theme of this year’s Peer Review Week is transparency. During the last few decades, I believe that a lack of transparency in the review process has degraded the field of scientific publishing. Authors were frequently left confused and angry when conflicting reviews lead to a rejection or when their paper received an obscure rejection and was not reviewed at all. Some journals still use the ...
متن کاملOpenness and Impact of Leading Scientific Countries
The rapid rise of international collaboration over the past three decades, demonstrated in coauthorship of scientific articles, raises the question of whether countries benefit from cooperative science and how this might be measured. We develop and compare measures to ask this question. For all source publications in 2013, we obtained from Elsevier national-level full and fractional paper count...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: EFSA Journal
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1831-4732,1831-4732
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.e13031